Open DataBane to view this research in your browser.
Compare firms · DataBane← Back to firms✦ Key Takeaways
Computed from current published firm data.
1Geographic reachEach firm is in a different country: Netherlands, United States.
2Activity in focus8 published transactions and 0 funds across the selected firms.
3Coverage varies2 selected profiles have missing fields across the six coverage categories shown below.
4Complementary investorsCompare 13 distinct recorded strategy labels across the selected institutions.
ABP1922Founded
NetherlandsHeadquarters
•••,•••Financial data requires accessReported AUM
0Funds
8Deals
15People
Coverage
United States
Choose a published firm
Choose a published firm
Reported AUM
Detailed Comparison
| Metric | ABP | Saronic Technologies, Inc. |
|---|
| Basics | Firm type | Pension Fund | Portfolio Company |
| Country | Netherlands | United States |
| Founded | 1922 | — |
| Firm age | 104 yrs | — |
| Roles | Lp | Portfolio Company |
| Tier | — | — |
| Scale & AUM | Other reported asset metrics | •••,•••Financial data requires access | •••,•••Financial data requires access |
| AUM | •••,•••Financial data requires access | •••,•••Financial data requires access |
| AUM band | •••,•••Financial data requires access | •••,•••Financial data requires access |
| Strategy & Focus | Recorded strategies | 13 recorded | Not yet recorded |
| Recorded strategy names | Residential / Multifamily, Office, Retail, Industrial / Logistics, Hospitality | Not yet recorded |
| Asset classes | private equity, infrastructure, real estate, venture capital, private credit, fixed income, other | Not recorded |
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Not classified |
| Diversification | Broad | Not classified |
| Geography & Markets | Geographic bias | Global | Not recorded |
| Geography tags | Global | — |
| Geography count | 1 | 0 |
| Fund Portfolio | Published funds | 0 | 0 |
| Largest fund | •••,•••Financial data requires access | •••,•••Financial data requires access |
| Vintage range | — | — |
| Fund status mix | — | — |
| Deal size preference | •••,•••Financial data requires access | •••,•••Financial data requires access |
| Performance | Avg. net IRR | •••,•••Financial data requires access | •••,•••Financial data requires access |
| Avg. TVPI | •••,•••Financial data requires access | •••,•••Financial data requires access |
| Funds with IRR data | •••,•••Financial data requires access | •••,•••Financial data requires access |
| Team & Contacts | Total contacts | 15 | 0 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | •••,•••Financial data requires access | •••,•••Financial data requires access |
| Network & Relationships | Connectivity score | 47/100 | 34/100 |
| Network strength | 23/100 | 7/100 |
| Total relationships | 30 | 4 |
| Relationship types | 3 | 3 |
| Network maturity | — | — |
| Relationship density | — | — |
| DNA & Classification | Market position | •••,•••Financial data requires access | •••,•••Financial data requires access |
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Not classified |
| Diversification | Broad | Not classified |
| Geographic bias | Global | Not recorded |
| Firm age | 104 years | Not disclosed |
Strategy Mix Comparison
Share of published fund records by strategy; not a share of AUM.
No published observations for this view.
◉ Coverage Gaps & Missing Intelligence
Six observable profile categories; this is completeness, not confidence.
ABP●Firm overview
●Strategies
○Funds & vehicles
●People
●Geography
○Reported AUM