Third Point vs Pershing Square Capital Management

A side-by-side comparison of Third Point and Pershing Square Capital Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Key observations

• Third Point is the most established (founded 1995), 8 years before Pershing Square Capital Management (2003).
• Third Point has the broadest mandate — active across 4 asset classes vs 3 for Pershing Square Capital Management.
• All 2 firms invest in Hedge Funds.
• Third Point is the only one here in Private Credit & Venture Capital, +1 more.
• All 2 are headquartered in United States.
• Pershing Square Capital Management's network is more connected (13/100 vs 0/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
• Overall similarity is 3%, driven by 1 shared asset classes, same country.

3%Similarity score1 shared asset classes · same country

	Third Point	Pershing Square Capital Management
Basics
Firm type	Asset Manager	Asset Manager
Country	United States	United States
Founded	1995	2003
Firm age	31 yrs	23 yrs
Roles	Gp	Gp, Advisor
Scale & AUM
Market position	Large ($20–100B)	Large ($20–100B)
Strategy & Focus
Investment style	Multi-asset	Multi-asset
Diversification	Diversified	Diversified
Asset classes	private credit, hedge funds, venture capital, fixed income	private equity, real estate, hedge funds
Shared asset classes	1: hedge funds

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Third Point and Pershing Square Capital Management?

Third Point is a asset manager based in United States, while Pershing Square Capital Management is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Third Point or Pershing Square Capital Management?

AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.

Third Point profile →Pershing Square Capital Management profile →

Explore more

All firms Build a custom comparison More Asset Manager firms Firms in United States Market intelligence Latest news

Geography
Geographic bias	Not recorded	North America
Regions		North America, Europe, Global

Network & Relationships
Connectivity	0/100	13/100
Network strength	0/100	1/100
Relationships	0	2
Relationship density	Very high	Very high
Network maturity	Emerging	Emerging

Team
Total contacts	6	8

Similarity
Overall similarity	3%
Asset class overlap	17%