A side-by-side comparison of SSO and State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) manages roughly 2.0× the assets of the other firm.
Both firms are active in 1 shared asset class out of 3 tracked between them.
| SSO | State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Public Pension Fund | Public Pension Fund |
| Country | Thailand | USA - WI |
| Founded | 1990 | 1951 |
| Firm age | 36 yrs | 75 yrs |
| Roles | Lp | Lp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $87.74B | $178B |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Giant ($100–500B) |
| AUM ratio | 2.0× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Diversified | Diversified |
SSO is a public pension fund based in Thailand, while State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) is a public pension fund based in USA - WI. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) is larger ($87.74B vs $178B).
| Asset classes |
| private equity, real estate, infrastructure |
| private equity, private credit, real estate, fixed income |
| Shared asset classes | 2: private equity, real estate |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Asia | Global |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia, Thailand | North America, Global, Global, Global |
| Shared geographies | North America, North America, Global | |
| Team | ||
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.0 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationship density | None | None |
| Network maturity | No network | No network |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 24% | |
| Asset class overlap | 40% | |
| Geography overlap | 29% | |