Lone Pine Capital vs Third Point

A side-by-side comparison of Lone Pine Capital and Third Point across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Key observations

• Third Point has the broadest mandate — active across 4 asset classes vs 2 for Lone Pine Capital.
• All 2 firms invest in Hedge Funds.
• Lone Pine Capital is the only one here in Private Equity.
• All 2 are headquartered in United States.
• Overall similarity is 4%, driven by 1 shared asset classes, same country.

4%Similarity score1 shared asset classes · same country

	Lone Pine Capital	Third Point
Basics
Firm type	Asset Manager	Asset Manager
Country	United States	United States
Founded	1997	1995
Firm age	29 yrs	31 yrs
Roles	Gp, Advisor	Gp
Scale & AUM
Market position	Mid ($5–20B)	Large ($20–100B)
Strategy & Focus
Investment style	private equity-focused	Multi-asset
Diversification	Moderate	Diversified
Asset classes	private equity, hedge funds	private credit, hedge funds, venture capital, fixed income
Shared asset classes	1: hedge funds

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Lone Pine Capital and Third Point?

Lone Pine Capital is a asset manager based in United States, while Third Point is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Lone Pine Capital or Third Point?

AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.

Lone Pine Capital profile →Third Point profile →

Explore more

All firms Build a custom comparison More Asset Manager firms Firms in United States Market intelligence Latest news

Geography
Geographic bias	North America	Not recorded
Regions	North America, Europe, Global, North America

Fund Portfolio
Published funds	1	0
Largest fund	Lone Mountain Pine Strategy	—
Vintage range	2025	—
Fund statuses	Investing (1)	—

Network & Relationships
Connectivity	0/100	0/100
Network strength	0/100	0/100
Relationship density	Moderate	Very high
Network maturity	Emerging	Emerging

Team
Total contacts	8	6

Similarity
Overall similarity	4%
Asset class overlap	20%