A side-by-side comparison of HPS Investment Partners and Third Point across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| HPS Investment Partners | Third Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 2007 | 1995 |
| Firm age | 19 yrs | 31 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | fixed income-focused | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Diversified |
| Strategies | 17 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Unitranche, Senior Secured | |
| Asset classes | fixed income, private credit | private credit, hedge funds, venture capital, fixed income |
HPS Investment Partners is a asset manager based in United States, while Third Point is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| Shared asset classes | 2: fixed income, private credit |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | Not recorded |
| Regions | North America, Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 6 | 0 |
| Largest fund | HPS Strategic Investment Partners V | — |
| Fund statuses | Closed (4), Fundraising (2) | — |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 21 | 6 |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 32/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 7/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationships | 3 | 0 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | Very high |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 10% | |
| Asset class overlap | 50% | |
