Crédit Agricole Assurances vs Viking Global Investors

A side-by-side comparison of Crédit Agricole Assurances and Viking Global Investors across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Key observations

• Viking Global Investors is the most established (founded 1999), 5 years before Crédit Agricole Assurances (2004).
• Crédit Agricole Assurances has the broadest mandate — active across 5 asset classes vs 2 for Viking Global Investors.
• All 2 firms invest in Private Equity, Private Credit.
• Crédit Agricole Assurances is the only one here in Real Estate & Infrastructure, +1 more.
• Each firm is in a different country: France, United States.
• Overall similarity is 16%, driven by 2 shared asset classes, 50% geo overlap.

16%Similarity score2 shared asset classes · 50% geo overlap

	Crédit Agricole Assurances	Viking Global Investors
Basics
Firm type	Investment Company	Investment Company
Country	France	United States
Founded	2004	1999
Firm age	22 yrs	27 yrs
Roles	Lp	Lp
Scale & AUM
Market position	Giant ($100–500B)	Large ($20–100B)
Strategy & Focus
Investment style	Multi-asset	private equity-focused
Diversification	Broad	Moderate
Asset classes	private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure, fixed income	private equity, private credit
Shared asset classes	2: private equity, private credit

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Crédit Agricole Assurances and Viking Global Investors?

Crédit Agricole Assurances is a investment company based in France, while Viking Global Investors is a investment company based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Crédit Agricole Assurances or Viking Global Investors?

AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.

Crédit Agricole Assurances profile →Viking Global Investors profile →

Explore more

All firms Build a custom comparison More Investment Company firms Firms in France Market intelligence Latest news

Geography
Geographic bias	North America	Global
Regions	North America, Europe	North America, Europe, Asia, Global
Shared geographies	North America, Europe

Network & Relationships
Connectivity	0/100	0/100
Network strength	0/100	0/100
Relationship density	Moderate	Moderate
Network maturity	Emerging	Emerging

Similarity
Overall similarity	16%
Asset class overlap	40%
Geography overlap	50%

Team
Total contacts	6	10