A side-by-side comparison of Crédit Agricole Assurances and New Jersey Division of Investment across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
| Crédit Agricole Assurances | New Jersey Division of Investment | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Investment Company | Investment Company |
| Country | France | United States |
| Founded | 2004 | 1950 |
| Firm age | 22 yrs | 76 yrs |
| Roles | Lp | Lp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Broad |
| Strategies | 55 — Buyout, Mid-Market Buyout, Growth Equity, Co-investment | |
| Asset classes | private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure, fixed income | |
Crédit Agricole Assurances is a investment company based in France, while New Jersey Division of Investment is a investment company based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| private equity, private credit, real estate, cash, infrastructure, fixed income, hedge funds, other, venture capital |
| Shared asset classes | 5: private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure, fixed income |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | Europe |
| Regions | North America, Europe | United States, North America, Europe, Asia |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 0 | 8 |
| Largest fund | — | ICG Europe Fund IX |
| Vintage range | — | 2025 |
| Fund statuses | — | Investing (8) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 6 | 34 |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 0/100 | 35/100 |
| Network strength | 0/100 | 43/100 |
| Relationships | 0 | 16 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | Very high |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 15% | |
| Asset class overlap | 56% | |
| Geography overlap | 29% | |