A side-by-side comparison of British Columbia Investment Management and PFA JP across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Both firms are active in 3 shared asset classes out of 4 tracked between them.
| British Columbia Investment Management | PFA JP | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Public Pension Fund | Public Pension Fund |
| Country | Canada | Japan |
| Founded | 1999 | 1967 |
| Firm age | 27 yrs | 59 yrs |
| Roles | Lp | Lp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Diversified |
| Asset classes | private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure, venture capital, fixed income, cash | private equity, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure |
| Shared asset classes | ||
British Columbia Investment Management is a public pension fund based in Canada, while PFA JP is a public pension fund based in Japan. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| 3: private equity, real estate, infrastructure |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | North America |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia, Canada | North America, Europe, Asia, Global |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe, Asia | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 4 | 0 |
| Largest fund | BCI Investment Grade Private Credit Fund | — |
| Vintage range | 2018–2026 | — |
| Fund statuses | Investing (4) | — |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 13 | 0 |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 23/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 5/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationships | 2 | 0 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | None |
| Network maturity | Emerging | No network |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 16% | |
| Asset class overlap | 38% | |
| Geography overlap | 56% | |
