DataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Border to Coast Pensions Partnership vs State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)
← Back to firms

Border to Coast Pensions Partnership vs State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)

A side-by-side comparison of Border to Coast Pensions Partnership and State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Border to Coast Pensions PartnershipGBP 55.4B
State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)$178B
Insight

State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) manages roughly 3.2× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Equity
Private Credit
Real Estate
Infrastructure
Fixed Income
Left bar: Border to Coast Pensions PartnershipRight bar: State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)
Insight

Both firms are active in 1 shared asset class out of 5 tracked between them.

Key observations

  • • State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) is the largest by AUM at $178B — 3.21× Border to Coast Pensions Partnership ($55.4B).
  • • State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) is the most established (founded 1951), 67 years before Border to Coast Pensions Partnership (2018).
  • • Border to Coast Pensions Partnership has the broadest mandate — active across 5 asset classes vs 4 for State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB).
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Equity, Private Credit, Real Estate, +1 more.
  • • Border to Coast Pensions Partnership is the only one here in Infrastructure.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: United Kingdom, USA - WI.
  • • Border to Coast Pensions Partnership's network is more connected (69/100 vs 0/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Overall similarity is 35%, driven by 4 shared asset classes, 50% geo overlap, same AUM band.
35%Similarity score4 shared asset classes · 50% geo overlap · same AUM band
Border to Coast Pensions PartnershipState of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)
Basics
Firm typePublic Pension FundPublic Pension Fund
CountryUnited KingdomUSA - WI
Founded20181951
Firm age8 yrs75 yrs
RolesLpLp
Scale & AUM
AUMGBP 55.4B$178B
Market positionLarge ($20–100B)Giant ($100–500B)
AUM ratio3.2× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadDiversified
Asset classesprivate equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure, fixed incomeprivate equity, private credit, real estate, fixed income
Shared asset classes4: private equity, private credit, real estate, fixed income
Geography
Geographic biasEuropeGlobal
RegionsNorth America, Europe, Asia, GlobalNorth America, Global, Global, Global
Shared geographiesNorth America, Global, North America
Team
Total contacts100
Team-to-AUM ratio0.2 per $B0.0 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity69/1000/100
Network strength94/1000/100
Relationships450
Relationship densityVery highNone
Network maturityEmergingNo network
Similarity
Overall similarity35%
Asset class overlap80%
Geography overlap50%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Border to Coast Pensions Partnership and State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)?

Border to Coast Pensions Partnership is a public pension fund based in United Kingdom, while State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) is a public pension fund based in USA - WI. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Border to Coast Pensions Partnership or State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)?

By reported AUM, State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) is larger (GBP 55.4B vs $178B).

Border to Coast Pensions Partnership profile →State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Public Pension Fund firmsFirms in United KingdomMarket intelligenceLatest news