DataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/AustralianSuper vs State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)
← Back to firms

AustralianSuper vs State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)

A side-by-side comparison of AustralianSuper and State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

AustralianSuperAUD 402.5B
State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)$178B
Insight

AustralianSuper manages roughly 2.3× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Real Estate
Left bar: AustralianSuperRight bar: State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • AustralianSuper is the largest by AUM at $402.5B — 2.26× State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) ($178B).
  • • State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) is the most established (founded 1951), 55 years before AustralianSuper (2006).
  • • AustralianSuper has the broadest mandate — active across 7 asset classes vs 4 for State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB).
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Equity, Private Credit, Real Estate, +1 more.
  • • AustralianSuper is the only one here in Hedge Funds & Infrastructure, +1 more.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: Australia, USA - WI.
  • • AustralianSuper's network is more connected (55/100 vs 0/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Overall similarity is 26%, driven by 4 shared asset classes, same AUM band.
26%Similarity score4 shared asset classes · same AUM band
AustralianSuperState of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)
Basics
Firm typePublic Pension FundPublic Pension Fund
CountryAustraliaUSA - WI
Founded20061951
Firm age20 yrs75 yrs
RolesLpLp
Scale & AUM
AUMAUD 402.5B$178B
Market positionGiant ($100–500B)Giant ($100–500B)
AUM ratio2.3× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadDiversified
Asset classesprivate equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure, venture capital, fixed incomeprivate equity, private credit, real estate, fixed income
Shared asset classes4: private equity, private credit, real estate, fixed income
Geography
Geographic biasAustraliaGlobal
RegionsNorth America, Global, Global, Global
Team
Total contacts170
Team-to-AUM ratio0.0 per $B0.0 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity55/1000/100
Network strength34/1000/100
Relationships180
Relationship densityHighNone
Network maturityEmergingNo network
Similarity
Overall similarity26%
Asset class overlap57%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between AustralianSuper and State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)?

AustralianSuper is a public pension fund based in Australia, while State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) is a public pension fund based in USA - WI. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, AustralianSuper or State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)?

By reported AUM, AustralianSuper is larger (AUD 402.5B vs $178B).

AustralianSuper profile →State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Public Pension Fund firmsFirms in AustraliaMarket intelligenceLatest news