DataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Australian Retirement Trust vs State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)
← Back to firms

Australian Retirement Trust vs State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)

A side-by-side comparison of Australian Retirement Trust and State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Australian Retirement TrustAUD 363.64B
State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)$178B
Insight

Australian Retirement Trust manages roughly 2.0× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Real Estate
Left bar: Australian Retirement TrustRight bar: State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Australian Retirement Trust is the largest by AUM at $363.64B — 2.04× State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) ($178B).
  • • State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) is the most established (founded 1951), 71 years before Australian Retirement Trust (2022).
  • • Australian Retirement Trust has the broadest mandate — active across 6 asset classes vs 4 for State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB).
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Equity, Private Credit, Real Estate.
  • • Australian Retirement Trust is the only one here in Hedge Funds & Infrastructure, +1 more.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: Australia, USA - WI.
  • • Australian Retirement Trust's network is more connected (66/100 vs 0/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Overall similarity is 31%, driven by 3 shared asset classes, 50% geo overlap, same AUM band.
31%Similarity score3 shared asset classes · 50% geo overlap · same AUM band
Australian Retirement TrustState of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)
Basics
Firm typePublic Pension FundPublic Pension Fund
CountryAustraliaUSA - WI
Founded20221951
Firm age4 yrs75 yrs
RolesLpLp
Scale & AUM
AUMAUD 363.64B$178B
Market positionGiant ($100–500B)Giant ($100–500B)
AUM ratio2.0× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadDiversified
Asset classesprivate equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure, venture capitalprivate equity, private credit, real estate, fixed income
Shared asset classes3: private equity, private credit, real estate
Geography
Geographic biasGlobalGlobal
RegionsNorth America, Europe, Asia, GlobalNorth America, Global, Global, Global
Shared geographiesNorth America, Global, Global
Team
Total contacts80
Team-to-AUM ratio0.0 per $B0.0 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity66/1000/100
Network strength58/1000/100
Relationships350
Relationship densityVery highNone
Network maturityEmergingNo network
Similarity
Overall similarity31%
Asset class overlap43%
Geography overlap50%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Australian Retirement Trust and State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)?

Australian Retirement Trust is a public pension fund based in Australia, while State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) is a public pension fund based in USA - WI. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Australian Retirement Trust or State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB)?

By reported AUM, Australian Retirement Trust is larger (AUD 363.64B vs $178B).

Australian Retirement Trust profile →State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Public Pension Fund firmsFirms in AustraliaMarket intelligenceLatest news