A side-by-side comparison of Alecta and Siemens Pension across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Alecta manages roughly 41.8× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Alecta | Siemens Pension | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Private Pension Fund | Private Pension Fund |
| Country | Sweden | Germany |
| Founded | 1917 | 1872 |
| Firm age | 109 yrs | 154 yrs |
| Roles | Lp | Lp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | SEK 1.46T | $35B |
| Market position | Mega ($500B+) | Large ($20–100B) |
| AUM ratio | 41.8× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Moderate | Broad |
| Strategies | ||
Alecta is a private pension fund based in Sweden, while Siemens Pension is a private pension fund based in Germany. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Alecta is larger (SEK 1.46T vs $35B).
| 8 — Office, Residential / Multifamily, Impact / Sustainable Credit, Government Bonds |
| Asset classes | private equity, real estate, infrastructure, venture capital, fixed income, cash, private credit | private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure, venture capital, fixed income, other |
| Shared asset classes | 6: private equity, real estate, infrastructure, venture capital, fixed income, private credit |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Sweden | Germany |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Sweden, United Kingdom | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 0 | 3 |
| Largest fund | — | NextT47 Fund 2024 |
| Vintage range | — | 2020–2024 |
| Fund statuses | — | Fundraising (3) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 17 | 7 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.0 per $B | 0.2 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 40/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 7/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationships | 6 | 0 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 23% | |
| Asset class overlap | 75% | |
