A side-by-side comparison of Alaska Permanent Fund and Public Investment Fund across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Public Investment Fund manages roughly 8.7× the assets of the other firm.
| Alaska Permanent Fund | Public Investment Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Sovereign Wealth Fund | Sovereign Wealth Fund |
| Country | United States | Saudi Arabia |
| Founded | 1976 | 1971 |
| Firm age | 50 yrs | 55 yrs |
| Roles | Lp | Lp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $61B | $528B |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Mega ($500B+) |
| AUM ratio | 8.7× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Broad |
| Strategies | ||
Alaska Permanent Fund is a sovereign wealth fund based in United States, while Public Investment Fund is a sovereign wealth fund based in Saudi Arabia. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Public Investment Fund is larger ($61B vs $528B).
Both firms are active in 3 shared asset classes out of 8 tracked between them.
| 49 — Buyout, Growth Equity, Venture Growth, Co-investment |
| 20 — Buyout, Growth Equity, Co-investment, Fund-of-Funds |
| Asset classes | private equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure, other, fixed income, cash, venture capital | private equity, real estate, infrastructure, fixed income, cash, other, venture capital |
| Shared strategies | 14: Buyout, Growth Equity, Co-investment |
| Shared asset classes | 7: private equity, real estate, infrastructure, other, fixed income, cash, venture capital |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Global | Saudi Arabia |
| Regions | United States, Europe, Asia, Latin America | Saudi Arabia, Middle East, North Africa, United States |
| Shared geographies | United States, Europe, Asia | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 2 | 8 |
| Largest fund | Na'-Nuk Investment Fund, LP | SoftBank Vision Fund |
| Vintage range | 2019–2020 | 2017–2026 |
| Fund statuses | Closed (2) | Investing (7), Fundraising (1) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 32 | 21 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.5 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 8/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 3/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationships | 1 | 0 |
| Relationship density | High | Very high |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 31% | |
| Strategy overlap | 17% | |
| Asset class overlap | 78% | |
| Geography overlap | 27% | |