DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Alaska Permanent Fund vs Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund
← Back to firms

Alaska Permanent Fund vs Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund

A side-by-side comparison of Alaska Permanent Fund and Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Alaska Permanent Fund$61B
Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund$350M
Insight

Alaska Permanent Fund manages roughly 174.3× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Equity
Private Credit
Real Estate
Hedge Funds
Infrastructure
Other
Fixed Income
Cash
Left bar: Alaska Permanent FundRight bar: Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Alaska Permanent Fund is the largest by AUM at $61B — 174.29× Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund ($350M).
  • • Alaska Permanent Fund is the most established (founded 1976), 38 years before Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund (2014).
  • • Alaska Permanent Fund has the broadest mandate — active across 9 asset classes vs 3 for Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Equity, Real Estate, Infrastructure.
  • • Alaska Permanent Fund is the only one here in Private Credit & Hedge Funds, +4 more.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: United States, Ghana.
  • • Alaska Permanent Fund's network is more connected (44/100 vs 0/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Overall similarity is 10%, driven by 3 shared asset classes.
10%Similarity score3 shared asset classes
Alaska Permanent FundGhana Infrastructure Investment Fund
Basics
Firm typeSovereign Wealth FundSovereign Wealth Fund
CountryUnited StatesGhana
Founded19762014
Firm age50 yrs12 yrs
RolesLpLp
Scale & AUM
AUM$61B$350M
Market positionLarge ($20–100B)Emerging (<$1B)
AUM ratio174.3× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadDiversified
Strategies49 — Buyout, Growth Equity, Venture Growth, Co-investment
Asset classesprivate equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure, other, fixed income, cash, venture capitalprivate equity, real estate, infrastructure
Shared asset classes3: private equity, real estate, infrastructure
Geography
Geographic biasGlobalGhana
RegionsUnited States, Europe, Asia, Latin America
Fund Portfolio
Published funds20
Largest fundNa'-Nuk Investment Fund, LP—
Vintage range2019–2020—
Fund statusesClosed (2)—
Team
Total contacts320
Team-to-AUM ratio0.5 per $B0.0 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity44/1000/100
Network strength61/1000/100
Relationships240
Relationship densityHighLow
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity10%
Asset class overlap33%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Alaska Permanent Fund and Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund?

Alaska Permanent Fund is a sovereign wealth fund based in United States, while Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund is a sovereign wealth fund based in Ghana. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Alaska Permanent Fund or Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund?

By reported AUM, Alaska Permanent Fund is larger ($61B vs $350M).

Alaska Permanent Fund profile →Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Sovereign Wealth Fund firmsFirms in United StatesMarket intelligenceLatest news