A side-by-side comparison of Alaska Permanent Fund and BIA across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
BIA manages roughly 1.2× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Alaska Permanent Fund | BIA | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Sovereign Wealth Fund | Sovereign Wealth Fund |
| Country | United States | Brunei |
| Founded | 1976 | 1983 |
| Firm age | 50 yrs | 43 yrs |
| Roles | Lp | Lp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $61B | $72.56B |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| AUM ratio | 1.2× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Diversified |
| Strategies | 49 — Buyout, Growth Equity, Venture Growth, Co-investment | |
| Asset classes | private equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure, other, fixed income, cash, venture capital | private equity, real estate, hedge funds, venture capital |
| Shared asset classes | 4: private equity, real estate, hedge funds, venture capital | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Global | Brunei |
| Regions | United States, Europe, Asia, Latin America | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 2 | 0 |
| Largest fund | Na'-Nuk Investment Fund, LP | — |
| Vintage range | 2019–2020 | — |
| Fund statuses | Closed (2) | — |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 32 | 0 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.5 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 44/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 61/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationships | 24 | 0 |
| Relationship density | High | None |
| Network maturity | Emerging | No network |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 24% | |
| Asset class overlap | 44% | |
Alaska Permanent Fund is a sovereign wealth fund based in United States, while BIA is a sovereign wealth fund based in Brunei. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, BIA is larger ($61B vs $72.56B).