DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutData methodologyPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) vs New Mexico SIC
← Back to firms

Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) vs New Mexico SIC

A side-by-side comparison of Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) and New Mexico SIC across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA)$1.13T
New Mexico SIC$70.42B
Insight

Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) manages roughly 16.0× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Equity
Real Estate
Left bar: Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA)Right bar: New Mexico SIC
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) is the largest by AUM at $1.13T — 16.05× New Mexico SIC ($70.42B).
  • • New Mexico SIC is the most established (founded 1958), 18 years before Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) (1976).
  • • Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) has the broadest mandate — active across 8 asset classes vs 3 for New Mexico SIC.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Equity, Real Estate, Infrastructure.
  • • Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) is the only one here in Hedge Funds & Fixed Income, +3 more.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: United Arab Emirates, Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States.
  • • Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA)'s network is more connected (53/100 vs 0/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Overall similarity is 19%, driven by 3 shared asset classes, adjacent AUM band.
19%Similarity score3 shared asset classes · adjacent AUM band
Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA)New Mexico SIC
Basics
Firm typeSovereign Wealth FundSovereign Wealth Fund
CountryUnited Arab EmiratesSanta Fe, New Mexico, United States
Founded19761958
Firm age50 yrs68 yrs
RolesLpLp
Scale & AUM
AUM$1.13T$70.42B
Market positionMega ($500B+)Large ($20–100B)
AUM ratio16.0× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadDiversified
Strategies19 — GP-led Secondaries, Continuation Vehicles, Take-Private, Minority / Structured Equity
Asset classesprivate equity, real estate, infrastructure, hedge funds, fixed income, cash, private credit, otherprivate equity, real estate, infrastructure
Shared asset classes3: private equity, real estate, infrastructure
Geography
Geographic biasNorth AmericaNorth America
RegionsNorth America, Europe, Asia, North AmericaNorth America, Europe, Asia, China
Shared geographiesNorth America, Europe, Asia
Fund Portfolio
Published funds10
Largest fundWarburg Pincus Capital Solutions Founders Fund—
Vintage range2023—
Fund statusesClosed (1)—
Team
Total contacts180
Team-to-AUM ratio0.0 per $B0.0 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity53/1000/100
Network strength35/1000/100
Relationships170
Relationship densityHighNone
Network maturityEmergingNo network
Similarity
Overall similarity19%
Asset class overlap38%
Geography overlap29%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) and New Mexico SIC?

Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) is a sovereign wealth fund based in United Arab Emirates, while New Mexico SIC is a sovereign wealth fund based in Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) or New Mexico SIC?

By reported AUM, Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) is larger ($1.13T vs $70.42B).

Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) profile →New Mexico SIC profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Sovereign Wealth Fund firmsFirms in United Arab EmiratesMarket intelligenceLatest news