DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutData methodologyPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Wellington Management vs Schroders
← Back to firms

Wellington Management vs Schroders

A side-by-side comparison of Wellington Management and Schroders across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Wellington Management$1.33T
SchrodersEUR 766.7B
Insight

Wellington Management manages roughly 1.7× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Fixed Income
Other
Private Equity
Real Estate
Infrastructure
Private Credit
Left bar: Wellington ManagementRight bar: Schroders
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Wellington Management is the largest by AUM at $1.33T — 1.74× Schroders ($766.7B).
  • • Schroders is the most established (founded 1804), 124 years before Wellington Management (1928).
  • • Schroders has the broadest mandate — active across 8 asset classes vs 7 for Wellington Management.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Fixed Income, Other, Private Credit, +2 more.
  • • Wellington Management is the only one here in Hedge Funds & Secondaries.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: United States, United Kingdom.
  • • Schroders's network is more connected (70/100 vs 36/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Strategy overlap is 3% (Jaccard) — 2 shared: Commercial Real Estate Debt, GP-led Secondaries.
  • • Overall similarity is 28%, driven by 1 shared strategies, 5 shared asset classes, same AUM band.
28%Similarity score1 shared strategies · 5 shared asset classes · same AUM band
Wellington ManagementSchroders
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
Founded19281804
Firm age98 yrs222 yrs
RolesLp, Gp, Service Provider, Advisor, LenderLp, Gp
Scale & AUM
AUM$1.33TEUR 766.7B
Market positionMega ($500B+)Mega ($500B+)
AUM ratio1.7× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadBroad
Strategies10 — CLOs, Private Placings, Commercial Real Estate Debt, Seed28 — Mid-Market Buyout, Buyout, Growth Equity, Co-investment
Asset classesfixed income, other, private credit, venture capital, hedge funds, secondaries, private equityprivate equity, real estate, infrastructure, fixed income, cash, private credit, venture capital, other
Shared strategies2: Commercial Real Estate Debt, GP-led Secondaries
Shared asset classes5: fixed income, other, private credit, venture capital, private equity
Geography
Geographic biasNorth AmericaUnited Kingdom
RegionsNorth America, Europe, Asia Pacific, North AmericaUnited Kingdom, United States, Europe, Asia
Shared geographiesEurope, Europe
Fund Portfolio
Published funds1028
Largest fundWellington Hadley Harbor IVSchroders Capital Private Equity Global Direct IV
Vintage range2019–20262023–2026
Fund statusesFundraising (3), Closed (7)Fundraising (26), Closed (2)
Team
Total contacts2238
Team-to-AUM ratio0.0 per $B0.0 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity36/10070/100
Network strength5/10032/100
Relationships523
Relationship densityModerateHigh
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity28%
Strategy overlap3%
Asset class overlap50%
Geography overlap14%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Wellington Management and Schroders?

Wellington Management is a asset manager based in United States, while Schroders is a asset manager based in United Kingdom. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Wellington Management or Schroders?

By reported AUM, Wellington Management is larger ($1.33T vs EUR 766.7B).

Wellington Management profile →Schroders profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United StatesMarket intelligenceLatest news