DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutData methodologyPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Wellington Management vs HPS Investment Partners
← Back to firms

Wellington Management vs HPS Investment Partners

A side-by-side comparison of Wellington Management and HPS Investment Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Wellington Management$1.33T
HPS Investment Partners$197B
Insight

Wellington Management manages roughly 6.8× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Fixed Income
Other
Left bar: Wellington ManagementRight bar: HPS Investment Partners
Insight

Both firms are active in 1 shared asset class out of 2 tracked between them.

Key observations

  • • Wellington Management is the largest by AUM at $1.33T — 6.77× HPS Investment Partners ($197B).
  • • Wellington Management is the most established (founded 1928), 79 years before HPS Investment Partners (2007).
  • • Wellington Management has the broadest mandate — active across 7 asset classes vs 2 for HPS Investment Partners.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Fixed Income, Private Credit.
  • • Wellington Management is the only one here in Other & Venture Capital, +3 more.
  • • All 2 are headquartered in United States.
  • • HPS Investment Partners's network is more connected (48/100 vs 36/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Overall similarity is 19%, driven by 2 shared asset classes, same AUM band, same country.
19%Similarity score2 shared asset classes · same AUM band · same country
Wellington ManagementHPS Investment Partners
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
Founded19282007
Firm age98 yrs19 yrs
RolesLp, Gp, Service Provider, Advisor, LenderGp
Scale & AUM
AUM$1.33T$197B
Market positionMega ($500B+)Giant ($100–500B)
AUM ratio6.8× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetfixed income-focused
DiversificationBroadBroad
Strategies10 — CLOs, Private Placings, Commercial Real Estate Debt, Seed17 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Unitranche, Senior Secured
Asset classesfixed income, other, private credit, venture capital, hedge funds, secondaries, private equityfixed income, private credit
Shared asset classes2: fixed income, private credit
Geography
Geographic biasNorth AmericaNorth America
RegionsNorth America, Europe, Asia Pacific, North AmericaNorth America, Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand
Shared geographiesNorth America, North America
Fund Portfolio
Published funds106
Largest fundWellington Hadley Harbor IVHPS Strategic Investment Partners V
Vintage range2019–2026—
Fund statusesFundraising (3), Closed (7)Closed (4), Fundraising (2)
Team
Total contacts2221
Team-to-AUM ratio0.0 per $B0.1 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity36/10048/100
Network strength5/10019/100
Relationships59
Relationship densityModerateModerate
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity19%
Asset class overlap29%
Geography overlap17%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Wellington Management and HPS Investment Partners?

Wellington Management is a asset manager based in United States, while HPS Investment Partners is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Wellington Management or HPS Investment Partners?

By reported AUM, Wellington Management is larger ($1.33T vs $197B).

Wellington Management profile →HPS Investment Partners profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United StatesMarket intelligenceLatest news