A side-by-side comparison of Wellington Management and Blue Owl Capital across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Wellington Management manages roughly 4.2× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Wellington Management | Blue Owl Capital | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1928 | 2021 |
| Firm age | 98 yrs | 5 yrs |
| Roles | Lp, Gp, Service Provider, Advisor, Lender | Gp, Lender, Public Listing |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $1.33T | $319B |
| Market position | Mega ($500B+) | Giant ($100–500B) |
| AUM ratio | 4.2× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Broad |
| Strategies | 10 — CLOs, Private Placings, Commercial Real Estate Debt, Seed | 34 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Senior Secured, Unitranche |
| Asset classes | fixed income, other, private credit, venture capital, hedge funds, secondaries, private equity | private credit, real estate, infrastructure, private equity, secondaries, venture capital |
| Shared strategies | 2: CLOs, GP-led Secondaries | |
| Shared asset classes | 4: private credit, venture capital, secondaries, private equity | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | United States |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, North America | United States, Canada, Europe, United States |
| Shared geographies | Europe, Europe | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 10 | 25 |
| Largest fund | Wellington Hadley Harbor IV | Blue Owl GP Stakes V |
| Vintage range | 2019–2026 | 2015–2026 |
| Fund statuses | Fundraising (3), Closed (7) | Closed (24), Fundraising (1) |
| Performance | ||
| Avg. net IRR | — | 13.1% |
| Avg. TVPI | — | 1.52x |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 22 | 32 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.0 per $B | 0.1 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 36/100 | 64/100 |
| Network strength | 5/100 | 36/100 |
| Relationships | 5 | 21 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | High |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 22% | |
| Strategy overlap | 5% | |
| Asset class overlap | 44% | |
| Geography overlap | 8% | |
Wellington Management is a asset manager based in United States, while Blue Owl Capital is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Wellington Management is larger ($1.33T vs $319B).