A side-by-side comparison of Viking Global Investors and Goldman Sachs across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Goldman Sachs manages roughly 54.4× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Viking Global Investors | Goldman Sachs | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Investment Company | Investment Company |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1999 | 1869 |
| Firm age | 27 yrs | 157 yrs |
| Roles | Lp | Gp, Advisor, Lender, Public Listing |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $57B | $3.1T |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Mega ($500B+) |
| AUM ratio | 54.4× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | private equity-focused | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Moderate | Moderate |
Viking Global Investors is a investment company based in United States, while Goldman Sachs is a investment company based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Goldman Sachs is larger ($57B vs $3.1T).
| Strategies |
| 9 — Buyout, Co-investment, GP Stakes, Direct Lending |
| Asset classes | private equity, private credit | private equity, private credit, fixed income, cash, real estate, infrastructure, venture capital, secondaries |
| Shared asset classes | 2: private equity, private credit |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Global | Europe |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia, Global | North America, United States, Europe, Asia Pacific |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 0 | 10 |
| Largest fund | — | West Street Loan Partners V |
| Vintage range | — | 2022–2026 |
| Fund statuses | — | Fundraising (3), Closed (7) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 10 | 25 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.2 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 0/100 | 8/100 |
| Network strength | 0/100 | 1/100 |
| Relationships | 0 | 1 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | High |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 17% | |
| Asset class overlap | 25% | |
| Geography overlap | 29% | |