A side-by-side comparison of UniCredit and New Jersey Division of Investment across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| UniCredit | New Jersey Division of Investment | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Investment Company | Investment Company |
| Country | Italy | United States |
| Founded | 1950 | |
| Firm age | 76 yrs | |
| Roles | Lp | Lp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| Market position | Mega ($500B+) | Large ($20–100B) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Broad |
| Strategies | 55 — Buyout, Mid-Market Buyout, Growth Equity, Co-investment | |
| Asset classes | private equity, private credit, hedge funds, infrastructure, fixed income, other | private equity, private credit, real estate, cash, infrastructure, fixed income, hedge funds, other, venture capital |
UniCredit is a investment company based in Italy, while New Jersey Division of Investment is a investment company based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| Shared asset classes | 6: private equity, private credit, hedge funds, infrastructure, fixed income, other |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Europe | Europe |
| Regions | Europe, Global, Europe, Global | United States, North America, Europe, Asia |
| Shared geographies | Europe, Global, Europe | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 0 | 8 |
| Largest fund | — | ICG Europe Fund IX |
| Vintage range | — | 2025 |
| Fund statuses | — | Investing (8) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 7 | 34 |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 8/100 | 35/100 |
| Network strength | 1/100 | 43/100 |
| Relationships | 1 | 16 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | Very high |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 18% | |
| Asset class overlap | 67% | |
| Geography overlap | 29% | |
