A side-by-side comparison of State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) and Border to Coast Pensions Partnership across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) manages roughly 3.2× the assets of the other firm.
Both firms are active in 1 shared asset class out of 5 tracked between them.
| State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) | Border to Coast Pensions Partnership | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Public Pension Fund | Public Pension Fund |
| Country | USA - WI | United Kingdom |
| Founded | 1951 | 2018 |
| Firm age | 75 yrs | 8 yrs |
| Roles | Lp | Lp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $178B | GBP 55.4B |
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| AUM ratio | 3.2× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Diversified | Broad |
State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) is a public pension fund based in USA - WI, while Border to Coast Pensions Partnership is a public pension fund based in United Kingdom. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB) is larger ($178B vs GBP 55.4B).
| Asset classes |
| private equity, private credit, real estate, fixed income |
| private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure, fixed income |
| Shared asset classes | 4: private equity, private credit, real estate, fixed income |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Global | Europe |
| Regions | North America, Global, Global, Global | North America, Europe, Asia, Global |
| Shared geographies | North America, Global, Global | |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 0 | 10 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.0 per $B | 0.2 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 0/100 | 35/100 |
| Network strength | 0/100 | 13/100 |
| Relationships | 0 | 5 |
| Relationship density | None | Very high |
| Network maturity | No network | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 35% | |
| Asset class overlap | 80% | |
| Geography overlap | 50% | |