A side-by-side comparison of Starwood Capital Group and Hamilton Lane across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Starwood Capital Group | Hamilton Lane | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1991 | 1991 |
| Firm age | 35 yrs | 35 yrs |
| Roles | Lp, Gp | Lp, Gp, Advisor |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $130B | $146.3B |
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Giant ($100–500B) |
| AUM ratio | 1.1× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | real estate-focused | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Focused | Broad |
Starwood Capital Group is a asset manager based in United States, while Hamilton Lane is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Hamilton Lane is larger ($130B vs $146.3B).
| Strategies |
| 3 — Opportunistic, Real Estate Debt, Digital Infrastructure |
| 23 — Co-investment, Fund-of-Funds, SMA / Managed Account, Evergreen / Semi-liquid Structure |
| Asset classes | real estate, infrastructure | private equity, private credit, real estate, secondaries, infrastructure, venture capital |
| Shared strategies | 1: Digital Infrastructure |
| Shared asset classes | 2: real estate, infrastructure |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Europe | North America |
| Regions | Europe, Asia | North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East |
| Shared geographies | Europe | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 3 | 19 |
| Largest fund | Starwood Real Estate Income Trust | Hamilton Lane Secondary Fund VI |
| Fund statuses | Closed (2), Investing (1) | Closed (6), Fundraising (13) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 10 | 44 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.1 per $B | 0.3 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Network strength | 15/100 | 19/100 |
| Relationships | 12 | 13 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 26% | |
| Strategy overlap | 4% | |
| Asset class overlap | 33% | |
| Geography overlap | 20% | |