A side-by-side comparison of Starwood Capital Group and Golub Capital across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Starwood Capital Group manages roughly 1.4× the assets of the other firm.
| Starwood Capital Group | Golub Capital | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1991 | 1994 |
| Firm age | 35 yrs | 32 yrs |
| Roles | Lp, Gp | Gp, Lender |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $130B | $90B |
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| AUM ratio | 1.4× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | real estate-focused | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Focused | Broad |
| Strategies | ||
Starwood Capital Group is a asset manager based in United States, while Golub Capital is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Starwood Capital Group is larger ($130B vs $90B).
| 3 — Opportunistic, Real Estate Debt, Digital Infrastructure |
| 13 — Direct Lending, Unitranche, First Lien, Second Lien |
| Asset classes | real estate, infrastructure | private credit, fixed income, secondaries, private equity |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Europe | United States |
| Regions | Europe, Asia | United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France |
| Shared geographies | Europe | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 3 | 7 |
| Largest fund | Starwood Real Estate Income Trust | GEMS Fund 6, L.P. |
| Vintage range | — | 2015–2024 |
| Fund statuses | Closed (2), Investing (1) | Closed (7) |
| Performance | ||
| Avg. net IRR | — | 9.8% |
| Avg. TVPI | — | 1.58x |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 10 | 33 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.1 per $B | 0.4 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 59/100 | 46/100 |
| Network strength | 15/100 | 17/100 |
| Relationships | 12 | 11 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 13% | |
| Geography overlap | 14% | |