A side-by-side comparison of Starwood Capital Group and BC Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Starwood Capital Group manages roughly 3.3× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Starwood Capital Group | BC Partners | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Founded | 1991 | 1986 |
| Firm age | 35 yrs | 40 yrs |
| Roles | Lp, Gp | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $130B | $40B |
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| AUM ratio | 3.3× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | real estate-focused | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Focused | Focused |
| Strategies | ||
Starwood Capital Group is a asset manager based in United States, while BC Partners is a asset manager based in London, United Kingdom. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Starwood Capital Group is larger ($130B vs $40B).
| 3 — Opportunistic, Real Estate Debt, Digital Infrastructure |
| 2 — Asset-Backed Finance (ABF), Senior Secured |
| Asset classes | real estate, infrastructure | private equity, private credit, real estate |
| Shared asset classes | 1: real estate |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Europe | North America |
| Regions | Europe, Asia | North America, Europe, France, Germany |
| Shared geographies | Europe | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 3 | 5 |
| Largest fund | Starwood Real Estate Income Trust | BC Partners Fund XI |
| Vintage range | — | 2021–2025 |
| Fund statuses | Closed (2), Investing (1) | Investing (1), Closed (4) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 10 | 13 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.1 per $B | 0.3 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 59/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 15/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationships | 12 | 0 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | Low |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 18% | |
| Asset class overlap | 25% | |
| Geography overlap | 11% | |