A side-by-side comparison of Russell Investments and Nuveen across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Nuveen manages roughly 3.4× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Russell Investments | Nuveen | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1936 | 1898 |
| Firm age | 90 yrs | 128 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Advisor | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $416B | $1.4T |
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Mega ($500B+) |
| AUM ratio | 3.4× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Broad |
| Asset classes | ||
Russell Investments is a asset manager based in United States, while Nuveen is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Nuveen is larger ($416B vs $1.4T).
| private equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure, venture capital, fixed income |
| private equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure, fixed income |
| Shared asset classes | 6: private equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure, fixed income |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Global | North America |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia, Global | North America, Europe, Global, North America |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe, Asia | |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 3 | 1 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.0 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 8/100 | 25/100 |
| Network strength | 2/100 | 3/100 |
| Relationships | 1 | 3 |
| Relationship density | High | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 43% | |
| Asset class overlap | 86% | |
| Geography overlap | 100% | |