A side-by-side comparison of Russell Investments and Manulife Investment Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Manulife Investment Management manages roughly 2.7× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Russell Investments | Manulife Investment Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | Canada |
| Founded | 1936 | 1980 |
| Firm age | 90 yrs | 46 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Advisor | Lp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $416B | CAD 1.11T |
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Mega ($500B+) |
| AUM ratio | 2.7× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Diversified |
| Asset classes | ||
Russell Investments is a asset manager based in United States, while Manulife Investment Management is a asset manager based in Canada. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Manulife Investment Management is larger ($416B vs CAD 1.11T).
| private equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure, venture capital, fixed income |
| private equity, private credit, real estate, fixed income |
| Shared asset classes | 4: private equity, private credit, real estate, fixed income |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Global | North America |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia, Global | North America, Europe, Asia, Global |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe, Asia | |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 3 | 0 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.0 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 8/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 2/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationships | 1 | 0 |
| Relationship density | High | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 35% | |
| Asset class overlap | 57% | |
| Geography overlap | 80% | |