A side-by-side comparison of Russell Investments and Invesco across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Russell Investments | Invesco | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1936 | 1935 |
| Firm age | 90 yrs | 91 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Advisor | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Mega ($500B+) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Broad |
| Asset classes | private equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure, venture capital, fixed income | private equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure, fixed income |
| Shared asset classes | ||
Russell Investments is a asset manager based in United States, while Invesco is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| 6: private equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure, fixed income |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Global | Global |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia, Global | North America, Europe, Asia, Global |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe, Asia | |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 3 | 9 |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 23/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 3/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationships | 2 | 0 |
| Relationship density | High | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 32% | |
| Asset class overlap | 86% | |
| Geography overlap | 100% | |
