DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutData methodologyPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Point72 Asset Management vs Wellington Management
← Back to firms

Point72 Asset Management vs Wellington Management

A side-by-side comparison of Point72 Asset Management and Wellington Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Point72 Asset Management$58.5B
Wellington Management$1.33T
Insight

Wellington Management manages roughly 22.8× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Fixed Income
Other
Left bar: Point72 Asset ManagementRight bar: Wellington Management
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Wellington Management is the largest by AUM at $1.33T — 22.79× Point72 Asset Management ($58.5B).
  • • Wellington Management is the most established (founded 1928), 86 years before Point72 Asset Management (2014).
  • • Wellington Management has the broadest mandate — active across 7 asset classes vs 4 for Point72 Asset Management.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Hedge Funds, Venture Capital, Private Equity, +1 more.
  • • Wellington Management is the only one here in Fixed Income & Other, +1 more.
  • • All 2 are headquartered in United States.
  • • Point72 Asset Management's network is more connected (76/100 vs 36/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Strategy overlap is 6% (Jaccard) — 2 shared: Multi-stage, Seed.
  • • Overall similarity is 21%, driven by 2 shared strategies, 4 shared asset classes, adjacent AUM band.
21%Similarity score2 shared strategies · 4 shared asset classes · adjacent AUM band · same country
Point72 Asset ManagementWellington Management
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
Founded20141928
Firm age12 yrs98 yrs
RolesGpLp, Gp, Service Provider, Advisor, Lender
Scale & AUM
AUM$58.5B$1.33T
Market positionLarge ($20–100B)Mega ($500B+)
AUM ratio22.8× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadBroad
Strategies23 — Long/Short Equity, Multi-Manager / Pod, Quantitative, Global Macro10 — CLOs, Private Placings, Commercial Real Estate Debt, Seed
Asset classeshedge funds, venture capital, private equity, private creditfixed income, other, private credit, venture capital, hedge funds, secondaries, private equity
Shared strategies2: Multi-stage, Seed
Shared asset classes4: hedge funds, venture capital, private equity, private credit
Geography
Geographic biasGlobalNorth America
RegionsGlobal, Global, JapanNorth America, Europe, Asia Pacific, North America
Fund Portfolio
Published funds810
Largest fundPoint72 Hyperscale inaugural fundWellington Hadley Harbor IV
Vintage range—2019–2026
Fund statusesFundraising (7), Closed (1)Fundraising (3), Closed (7)
Team
Total contacts4422
Team-to-AUM ratio0.8 per $B0.0 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity76/10036/100
Network strength81/1005/100
Relationships535
Relationship densityVery highModerate
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity21%
Strategy overlap6%
Asset class overlap57%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Point72 Asset Management and Wellington Management?

Point72 Asset Management is a asset manager based in United States, while Wellington Management is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Point72 Asset Management or Wellington Management?

By reported AUM, Wellington Management is larger ($58.5B vs $1.33T).

Point72 Asset Management profile →Wellington Management profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United StatesMarket intelligenceLatest news