DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutData methodologyPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Point72 Asset Management vs Schroders
← Back to firms

Point72 Asset Management vs Schroders

A side-by-side comparison of Point72 Asset Management and Schroders across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Point72 Asset Management$58.5B
SchrodersEUR 766.7B
Insight

Schroders manages roughly 13.1× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Equity
Real Estate
Infrastructure
Private Credit
Left bar: Point72 Asset ManagementRight bar: Schroders
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Schroders is the largest by AUM at $766.7B — 13.11× Point72 Asset Management ($58.5B).
  • • Schroders is the most established (founded 1804), 210 years before Point72 Asset Management (2014).
  • • Schroders has the broadest mandate — active across 8 asset classes vs 4 for Point72 Asset Management.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Venture Capital, Private Equity, Private Credit.
  • • Point72 Asset Management is the only one here in Hedge Funds.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: United States, United Kingdom.
  • • Point72 Asset Management's network is more connected (76/100 vs 70/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Strategy overlap is 16% (Jaccard) — 7 shared: Early-stage (Series A/B), Growth, Growth Equity and 4 more.
  • • Overall similarity is 18%, driven by 7 shared strategies, 3 shared asset classes, adjacent AUM band.
18%Similarity score7 shared strategies · 3 shared asset classes · adjacent AUM band
Point72 Asset ManagementSchroders
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
Founded20141804
Firm age12 yrs222 yrs
RolesGpLp, Gp
Scale & AUM
AUM$58.5BEUR 766.7B
Market positionLarge ($20–100B)Mega ($500B+)
AUM ratio13.1× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadBroad
Strategies23 — Long/Short Equity, Multi-Manager / Pod, Quantitative, Global Macro28 — Mid-Market Buyout, Buyout, Growth Equity, Co-investment
Asset classeshedge funds, venture capital, private equity, private creditprivate equity, real estate, infrastructure, fixed income, cash, private credit, venture capital, other
Shared strategies7: Early-stage (Series A/B), Growth, Growth Equity
Shared asset classes3: venture capital, private equity, private credit
Geography
Geographic biasGlobalUnited Kingdom
RegionsGlobal, Global, JapanUnited Kingdom, United States, Europe, Asia
Fund Portfolio
Published funds828
Largest fundPoint72 Hyperscale inaugural fundSchroders Capital Private Equity Global Direct IV
Vintage range—2023–2026
Fund statusesFundraising (7), Closed (1)Fundraising (26), Closed (2)
Team
Total contacts4438
Team-to-AUM ratio0.8 per $B0.0 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity76/10070/100
Network strength81/10032/100
Relationships5323
Relationship densityVery highHigh
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity18%
Strategy overlap16%
Asset class overlap33%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Point72 Asset Management and Schroders?

Point72 Asset Management is a asset manager based in United States, while Schroders is a asset manager based in United Kingdom. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Point72 Asset Management or Schroders?

By reported AUM, Schroders is larger ($58.5B vs EUR 766.7B).

Point72 Asset Management profile →Schroders profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United StatesMarket intelligenceLatest news