A side-by-side comparison of Point72 Asset Management and HPS Investment Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
HPS Investment Partners manages roughly 3.4× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Point72 Asset Management | HPS Investment Partners | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 2014 | 2007 |
| Firm age | 12 yrs | 19 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $58.5B | $197B |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Giant ($100–500B) |
| AUM ratio | 3.4× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | fixed income-focused |
| Diversification | Broad | Broad |
| Strategies | 23 — Long/Short Equity, Multi-Manager / Pod, Quantitative, Global Macro | 17 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Unitranche, Senior Secured |
| Asset classes | hedge funds, venture capital, private equity, private credit | fixed income, private credit |
| Shared strategies | 3: Asset-Backed Finance (ABF), Real Estate Debt, Direct Lending | |
| Shared asset classes | 1: private credit | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Global | North America |
| Regions | Global, Global, Japan | North America, Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 8 | 6 |
| Largest fund | Point72 Hyperscale inaugural fund | HPS Strategic Investment Partners V |
| Fund statuses | Fundraising (7), Closed (1) | Closed (4), Fundraising (2) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 44 | 21 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.8 per $B | 0.1 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 76/100 | 48/100 |
| Network strength | 81/100 | 19/100 |
| Relationships | 53 | 9 |
| Relationship density | Very high | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 17% | |
| Strategy overlap | 8% | |
| Asset class overlap | 20% | |
Point72 Asset Management is a asset manager based in United States, while HPS Investment Partners is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, HPS Investment Partners is larger ($58.5B vs $197B).