PFA JP vs SSO
A side-by-side comparison of PFA JP and SSO across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Key observations
- • SSO and PFA JP are comparable in size (within 1.01× on AUM).
- • PFA JP is the most established (founded 1967), 23 years before SSO (1990).
- • PFA JP has the broadest mandate — active across 4 asset classes vs 3 for SSO.
- • All 2 firms invest in Private Equity, Real Estate, Infrastructure.
- • PFA JP is the only one here in Hedge Funds.
- • Each firm is in a different country: Japan, Thailand.
| PFA JP | SSO | |
|---|---|---|
| Firm type | Public Pension Fund | Public Pension Fund |
| Country | Japan | Thailand |
| AUM | $86.79 | $87.74 |
| Founded | 1967 | 1990 |
| Roles | Lp | Lp |
| Strategies | — | — |
Frequently asked
What is the difference between PFA JP and SSO?
PFA JP is a public pension fund based in Japan, while SSO is a public pension fund based in Thailand. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
Which is larger, PFA JP or SSO?
By reported AUM, SSO is larger ($86.79 vs $87.74).