A side-by-side comparison of PFA JP and Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| PFA JP | Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Public Pension Fund | Public Pension Fund |
| Country | Japan | USA - CA |
| Founded | 1967 | 1937 |
| Firm age | 59 yrs | 89 yrs |
| Roles | Lp | Lp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $86.79B | $87.97B |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| AUM ratio | 1.0× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Diversified | Diversified |
PFA JP is a public pension fund based in Japan, while Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association is a public pension fund based in USA - CA. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association is larger ($86.79B vs $87.97B).
| Asset classes |
| private equity, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure |
| private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure |
| Shared asset classes | 3: private equity, real estate, infrastructure |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | North America |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia, Global | United States, North America, Europe, Asia |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe, Asia | |
| Team | ||
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.0 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 0/100 | 8/100 |
| Network strength | 0/100 | 1/100 |
| Relationships | 0 | 1 |
| Relationship density | None | Low |
| Network maturity | No network | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 38% | |
| Asset class overlap | 60% | |
| Geography overlap | 71% | |