A side-by-side comparison of PFA JP and Border to Coast Pensions Partnership across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
PFA JP manages roughly 1.6× the assets of the other firm.
Both firms are active in 3 shared asset classes out of 6 tracked between them.
| PFA JP | Border to Coast Pensions Partnership | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Public Pension Fund | Public Pension Fund |
| Country | Japan | United Kingdom |
| Founded | 1967 | 2018 |
| Firm age | 59 yrs | 8 yrs |
| Roles | Lp | Lp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $86.79B | GBP 55.4B |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| AUM ratio | 1.6× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Diversified | Broad |
| Asset classes | ||
PFA JP is a public pension fund based in Japan, while Border to Coast Pensions Partnership is a public pension fund based in United Kingdom. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, PFA JP is larger ($86.79B vs GBP 55.4B).
| private equity, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure |
| private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure, fixed income |
| Shared asset classes | 3: private equity, real estate, infrastructure |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | Europe |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia, Global | North America, Europe, Asia, Global |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe, Asia | |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 0 | 10 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.0 per $B | 0.2 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 0/100 | 35/100 |
| Network strength | 0/100 | 13/100 |
| Relationships | 0 | 5 |
| Relationship density | None | Very high |
| Network maturity | No network | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 34% | |
| Asset class overlap | 50% | |
| Geography overlap | 57% | |