A side-by-side comparison of Pershing Square Capital Management and Starwood Capital Group across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
| Pershing Square Capital Management | Starwood Capital Group | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 2003 | 1991 |
| Firm age | 23 yrs | 35 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Advisor | Lp, Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $130B | |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Giant ($100–500B) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | real estate-focused |
| Diversification | Diversified | Focused |
| Strategies | 3 — Opportunistic, Real Estate Debt, Digital Infrastructure | |
Pershing Square Capital Management is a asset manager based in United States, while Starwood Capital Group is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| Asset classes | private equity, real estate, hedge funds | real estate, infrastructure |
| Shared asset classes | 1: real estate |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | Europe |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Global | Europe, Asia |
| Shared geographies | Europe | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 0 | 3 |
| Largest fund | — | Starwood Real Estate Income Trust |
| Fund statuses | — | Closed (2), Investing (1) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 8 | 10 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | — | 0.1 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 13/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 1/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationships | 2 | 0 |
| Relationship density | Very high | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 9% | |
| Asset class overlap | 25% | |
| Geography overlap | 25% | |