A side-by-side comparison of Pershing Square Capital Management and Monroe Capital across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
| Pershing Square Capital Management | Monroe Capital | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 2003 | 2004 |
| Firm age | 23 yrs | 22 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Advisor | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $23.8B | |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Diversified | Broad |
| Strategies | 16 — Direct Lending, Senior Secured, Unitranche, Asset-Based Lending | |
Pershing Square Capital Management is a asset manager based in United States, while Monroe Capital is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| Asset classes |
| private equity, real estate, hedge funds |
| private credit, real estate, private equity |
| Shared asset classes | 2: private equity, real estate |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | United States |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Global | United States, Canada |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 0 | 12 |
| Largest fund | — | Monroe Capital Private Credit Fund V |
| Vintage range | — | 2014–2026 |
| Fund statuses | — | Closed (10), Fundraising (2) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 8 | 39 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | — | 1.6 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 13/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 1/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationships | 2 | 0 |
| Relationship density | Very high | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 10% | |
| Asset class overlap | 50% | |
