Pershing Square Capital Management vs Farallon Capital Management

A side-by-side comparison of Pershing Square Capital Management and Farallon Capital Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Key observations

• Farallon Capital Management is the most established (founded 1986), 17 years before Pershing Square Capital Management (2003).
• All 2 firms invest in Real Estate, Hedge Funds.
• Pershing Square Capital Management is the only one here in Private Equity.
• All 2 are headquartered in United States.
• Pershing Square Capital Management's network is more connected (13/100 vs 0/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
• Overall similarity is 21%, driven by 2 shared asset classes, 75% geo overlap, same country.

21%Similarity score2 shared asset classes · 75% geo overlap · same country

	Pershing Square Capital Management	Farallon Capital Management
Basics
Firm type	Asset Manager	Asset Manager
Country	United States	United States
Founded	2003	1986
Firm age	23 yrs	40 yrs
Roles	Gp, Advisor	Gp
Scale & AUM
Market position	Large ($20–100B)	Large ($20–100B)
Strategy & Focus
Investment style	Multi-asset	Multi-asset
Diversification	Diversified	Diversified
Asset classes	private equity, real estate, hedge funds	private credit, real estate, hedge funds
Shared asset classes	2: real estate, hedge funds

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Pershing Square Capital Management and Farallon Capital Management?

Pershing Square Capital Management is a asset manager based in United States, while Farallon Capital Management is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Pershing Square Capital Management or Farallon Capital Management?

AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.

Pershing Square Capital Management profile →Farallon Capital Management profile →

Explore more

All firms Build a custom comparison More Asset Manager firms Firms in United States Market intelligence Latest news

Geography
Geographic bias	North America	Global
Regions	North America, Europe, Global	North America, Europe, Asia, Global
Shared geographies	North America, Europe, Global

Network & Relationships
Connectivity	13/100	0/100
Network strength	1/100	0/100
Relationships	2	0
Relationship density	Very high	High
Network maturity	Emerging	Emerging

Similarity
Overall similarity	21%
Asset class overlap	50%
Geography overlap	75%

Team
Total contacts	8	13