A side-by-side comparison of Pershing Square Capital Management and Ares Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Pershing Square Capital Management | Ares Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 2003 | 1997 |
| Firm age | 23 yrs | 29 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Advisor | Gp, Lender |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Diversified | Broad |
| Asset classes | private equity, real estate, hedge funds | private equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure |
| Shared asset classes | 3: private equity, real estate, hedge funds | |
Pershing Square Capital Management is a asset manager based in United States, while Ares Management is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | North America |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Global | United States, North America, Europe, Asia |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe | |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 8 | 3 |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 13/100 | 42/100 |
| Network strength | 1/100 | 16/100 |
| Relationships | 2 | 7 |
| Relationship density | Very high | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 14% | |
| Asset class overlap | 60% | |
| Geography overlap | 11% | |