A side-by-side comparison of Pacific Equity Partners and Lexington Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
| Pacific Equity Partners | Lexington Partners | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | Australia | United States |
| Founded | 1998 | 1994 |
| Firm age | 28 yrs | 32 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Lp, Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| Market position | Mid ($5–20B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | private equity-focused | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Focused | Broad |
| Strategies | 4 — Buyout, Buy-and-Build, Public-to-Private, Senior Secured | 10 — LP-led Secondaries, GP-led Secondaries, Continuation Vehicles, Co-investment |
| Asset classes | private equity, private credit | |
Pacific Equity Partners is a asset manager based in Australia, while Lexington Partners is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| secondaries, private equity, venture capital |
| Shared strategies | 1: Buyout |
| Shared asset classes | 1: private equity |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Australia | Not recorded |
| Regions | Australia, New Zealand | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 9 | 1 |
| Largest fund | Pacific Equity Partners Fund VII | Lexington Capital Partners X |
| Vintage range | 2015–2024 | 2023 |
| Fund statuses | Closed (1), Investing (2), Harvesting (2), Liquidated (1), Fundraising (3) | Closed (1) |
| Performance | ||
| Avg. net IRR | 53.0% | — |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 13 | 50 |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 0/100 | 8/100 |
| Network strength | 0/100 | 3/100 |
| Relationships | 0 | 1 |
| Relationship density | High | Low |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 7% | |
| Strategy overlap | 8% | |
| Asset class overlap | 25% | |
