A side-by-side comparison of Oaktree Capital Management and Farallon Capital Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
| Oaktree Capital Management | Farallon Capital Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1995 | 1986 |
| Firm age | 31 yrs | 40 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $224B | |
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Diversified |
| Strategies | 18 — Distressed Debt, Opportunistic Credit, Direct Lending, Senior Secured Loans | |
Oaktree Capital Management is a asset manager based in United States, while Farallon Capital Management is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| Asset classes |
| private credit, fixed income, private equity, real estate, other |
| private credit, real estate, hedge funds |
| Shared asset classes | 2: private credit, real estate |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | Global |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Emerging Markets, Global | North America, Europe, Asia, Global |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe, Global | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 5 | 0 |
| Largest fund | Oaktree Opportunities Fund XII | — |
| Fund statuses | Closed (5) | — |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 24 | 13 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.1 per $B | — |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | High |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 16% | |
| Asset class overlap | 33% | |
| Geography overlap | 60% | |
