A side-by-side comparison of Oaktree Capital Management and AQR Capital Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Oaktree Capital Management | AQR Capital Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1995 | 1998 |
| Firm age | 31 yrs | 28 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $224B | $237.8B |
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Giant ($100–500B) |
| AUM ratio | 1.1× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | hedge funds-focused |
| Diversification | Broad | Broad |
| Strategies | ||
Oaktree Capital Management is a asset manager based in United States, while AQR Capital Management is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, AQR Capital Management is larger ($224B vs $237.8B).
| 18 — Distressed Debt, Opportunistic Credit, Direct Lending, Senior Secured Loans |
| 15 — Quantitative, Equity Market Neutral, Managed Futures / CTA, Multi-strategy |
| Asset classes | private credit, fixed income, private equity, real estate, other | hedge funds, other |
| Shared strategies | 1: Emerging Markets Equity |
| Shared asset classes | 1: other |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | North America |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Emerging Markets, Global | North America, Europe, Asia, South Africa |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 5 | 22 |
| Largest fund | Oaktree Opportunities Fund XII | AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund |
| Fund statuses | Closed (5) | Fundraising (22) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 24 | 37 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.1 per $B | 0.2 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 49/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 9/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationships | 11 | 0 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | Low |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 23% | |
| Strategy overlap | 3% | |
| Asset class overlap | 17% | |
| Geography overlap | 29% | |