A side-by-side comparison of Oaktree Capital Management and Antin Infrastructure Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Oaktree Capital Management manages roughly 6.7× the assets of the other firm.
| Oaktree Capital Management | Antin Infrastructure Partners | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | France |
| Founded | 1995 | 2007 |
| Firm age | 31 yrs | 19 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp, Public Listing |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $224B | EUR 33.3B |
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| AUM ratio | 6.7× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | infrastructure-focused |
| Diversification | Broad | Moderate |
Oaktree Capital Management is a asset manager based in United States, while Antin Infrastructure Partners is a asset manager based in France. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Oaktree Capital Management is larger ($224B vs EUR 33.3B).
| Strategies |
| 18 — Distressed Debt, Opportunistic Credit, Direct Lending, Senior Secured Loans |
| 7 — Value-Add, Digital Infrastructure, Transport, Renewables |
| Asset classes | private credit, fixed income, private equity, real estate, other | infrastructure |
| Shared strategies | 1: Value-Add |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | Europe |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Emerging Markets, Global | Europe, North America |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 5 | 10 |
| Largest fund | Oaktree Opportunities Fund XII | Antin Flagship Fund V |
| Vintage range | — | 2008–2022 |
| Fund statuses | Closed (5) | Closed (9), Fundraising (1) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 24 | 94 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.1 per $B | 2.8 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 49/100 | 73/100 |
| Network strength | 9/100 | 54/100 |
| Relationships | 11 | 46 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | Very high |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 19% | |
| Geography overlap | 50% | |