A side-by-side comparison of New Mexico SIC and Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| New Mexico SIC | Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Sovereign Wealth Fund | Sovereign Wealth Fund |
| Country | Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States | United Arab Emirates |
| Founded | 1958 | 1976 |
| Firm age | 68 yrs | 50 yrs |
| Roles | Lp | Lp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Mega ($500B+) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Diversified | Broad |
| Strategies | 19 — GP-led Secondaries, Continuation Vehicles, Take-Private, Minority / Structured Equity | |
| Asset classes | private equity, real estate, infrastructure | |
New Mexico SIC is a sovereign wealth fund based in Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States, while Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) is a sovereign wealth fund based in United Arab Emirates. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| private equity, real estate, infrastructure, hedge funds, fixed income, cash, private credit, other |
| Shared asset classes | 3: private equity, real estate, infrastructure |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | North America |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia, China | North America, Europe, Asia, North America |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe, Asia | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 0 | 1 |
| Largest fund | — | Warburg Pincus Capital Solutions Founders Fund |
| Vintage range | — | 2023 |
| Fund statuses | — | Closed (1) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 0 | 18 |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 0/100 | 23/100 |
| Network strength | 0/100 | 5/100 |
| Relationships | 0 | 2 |
| Relationship density | None | High |
| Network maturity | No network | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 12% | |
| Asset class overlap | 38% | |
| Geography overlap | 29% | |