A side-by-side comparison of New Jersey Division of Investment and Goldman Sachs across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Goldman Sachs manages roughly 32.4× the assets of the other firm.
| New Jersey Division of Investment | Goldman Sachs | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Investment Company | Investment Company |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1950 | 1869 |
| Firm age | 76 yrs | 157 yrs |
| Roles | Lp | Gp, Advisor, Lender, Public Listing |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $95.7B | $3.1T |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Mega ($500B+) |
| AUM ratio | 32.4× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Moderate |
New Jersey Division of Investment is a investment company based in United States, while Goldman Sachs is a investment company based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Goldman Sachs is larger ($95.7B vs $3.1T).
Both firms are active in 4 shared asset classes out of 8 tracked between them.
| Strategies |
| 55 — Buyout, Mid-Market Buyout, Growth Equity, Co-investment |
| 9 — Buyout, Co-investment, GP Stakes, Direct Lending |
| Asset classes | private equity, private credit, real estate, cash, infrastructure, fixed income, hedge funds, other, venture capital | private equity, private credit, fixed income, cash, real estate, infrastructure, venture capital, secondaries |
| Shared strategies | 10: Buyout, Co-investment, Co-investment |
| Shared asset classes | 7: private equity, private credit, real estate, cash, infrastructure, fixed income, venture capital |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Europe | Europe |
| Regions | United States, North America, Europe, Asia | North America, United States, Europe, Asia Pacific |
| Shared geographies | United States, North America, Europe | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 8 | 10 |
| Largest fund | ICG Europe Fund IX | West Street Loan Partners V |
| Vintage range | 2025 | 2022–2026 |
| Fund statuses | Investing (8) | Fundraising (3), Closed (7) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 34 | 25 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.4 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 34/100 | 8/100 |
| Network strength | 40/100 | 1/100 |
| Relationships | 15 | 1 |
| Relationship density | Very high | High |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 29% | |
| Strategy overlap | 10% | |
| Asset class overlap | 70% | |
| Geography overlap | 33% | |