A side-by-side comparison of Lone Pine Capital and Farallon Capital Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
| Lone Pine Capital | Farallon Capital Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1997 | 1986 |
| Firm age | 29 yrs | 40 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Advisor | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| Market position | Mid ($5–20B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | private equity-focused | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Moderate | Diversified |
| Asset classes | private equity, hedge funds | private credit, real estate, hedge funds |
| Shared asset classes | 1: hedge funds | |
Lone Pine Capital is a asset manager based in United States, while Farallon Capital Management is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | Global |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Global, North America | North America, Europe, Asia, Global |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe, Global | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 1 | 0 |
| Largest fund | Lone Mountain Pine Strategy | — |
| Vintage range | 2025 | — |
| Fund statuses | Investing (1) | — |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 8 | 13 |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | High |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 14% | |
| Asset class overlap | 25% | |
| Geography overlap | 60% | |