A side-by-side comparison of Lexington Partners and StepStone Group across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Lexington Partners | StepStone Group | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1994 | 2007 |
| Firm age | 32 yrs | 19 yrs |
| Roles | Lp, Gp | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Giant ($100–500B) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Broad |
| Strategies | 10 — LP-led Secondaries, GP-led Secondaries, Continuation Vehicles, Co-investment | |
| Asset classes | secondaries, private equity, venture capital | private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure, venture capital |
Lexington Partners is a asset manager based in United States, while StepStone Group is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| Shared asset classes | 2: private equity, venture capital |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Not recorded | North America |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia, Africa | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 1 | 0 |
| Largest fund | Lexington Capital Partners X | — |
| Vintage range | 2023 | — |
| Fund statuses | Closed (1) | — |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 50 | 3 |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 8/100 | 43/100 |
| Network strength | 3/100 | 11/100 |
| Relationships | 1 | 5 |
| Relationship density | Low | Very high |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 7% | |
| Asset class overlap | 33% | |
