A side-by-side comparison of HPS Investment Partners and Schroders across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Schroders manages roughly 3.9× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| HPS Investment Partners | Schroders | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United Kingdom |
| Founded | 2007 | 1804 |
| Firm age | 19 yrs | 222 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Lp, Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $197B | EUR 766.7B |
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Mega ($500B+) |
| AUM ratio | 3.9× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | fixed income-focused | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Broad |
| Strategies | 17 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Unitranche, Senior Secured | 28 — Mid-Market Buyout, Buyout, Growth Equity, Co-investment |
| Asset classes | fixed income, private credit | private equity, real estate, infrastructure, fixed income, cash, private credit, venture capital, other |
| Shared strategies | 3: Asset-Backed Finance (ABF), Real Estate Debt, High Yield | |
| Shared asset classes | 2: fixed income, private credit | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | United Kingdom |
| Regions | North America, Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand | United Kingdom, United States, Europe, Asia |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 6 | 28 |
| Largest fund | HPS Strategic Investment Partners V | Schroders Capital Private Equity Global Direct IV |
| Vintage range | — | 2023–2026 |
| Fund statuses | Closed (4), Fundraising (2) | Fundraising (26), Closed (2) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 21 | 38 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.1 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 48/100 | 70/100 |
| Network strength | 19/100 | 32/100 |
| Relationships | 9 | 23 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | High |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 18% | |
| Strategy overlap | 7% | |
| Asset class overlap | 25% | |
HPS Investment Partners is a asset manager based in United States, while Schroders is a asset manager based in United Kingdom. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Schroders is larger ($197B vs EUR 766.7B).