A side-by-side comparison of HPS Investment Partners and Pershing Square Capital Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| HPS Investment Partners | Pershing Square Capital Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 2007 | 2003 |
| Firm age | 19 yrs | 23 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp, Advisor |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | fixed income-focused | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Diversified |
| Strategies | 17 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Unitranche, Senior Secured | |
| Asset classes | fixed income, private credit | private equity, real estate, hedge funds |
HPS Investment Partners is a asset manager based in United States, while Pershing Square Capital Management is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | North America |
| Regions | North America, Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand | North America, Europe, Global |
| Shared geographies | North America | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 6 | 0 |
| Largest fund | HPS Strategic Investment Partners V | — |
| Fund statuses | Closed (4), Fundraising (2) | — |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 21 | 8 |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 32/100 | 13/100 |
| Network strength | 7/100 | 1/100 |
| Relationships | 3 | 2 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | Very high |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 3% | |
| Geography overlap | 17% | |
