A side-by-side comparison of HPS Investment Partners and Pacific Equity Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
HPS Investment Partners manages roughly 11.6× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| HPS Investment Partners | Pacific Equity Partners | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | Australia |
| Founded | 2007 | 1998 |
| Firm age | 19 yrs | 28 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $197B | AUD 17B |
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Mid ($5–20B) |
| AUM ratio | 11.6× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | fixed income-focused | private equity-focused |
| Diversification | Broad | Focused |
| Strategies | 17 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Unitranche, Senior Secured | 4 — Buyout, Buy-and-Build, Public-to-Private, Senior Secured |
| Asset classes | fixed income, private credit | private equity, private credit |
| Shared strategies | 1: Senior Secured | |
| Shared asset classes | 1: private credit | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | Australia |
| Regions | North America, Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand | Australia, New Zealand |
| Shared geographies | Australia, New Zealand | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 6 | 9 |
| Largest fund | HPS Strategic Investment Partners V | Pacific Equity Partners Fund VII |
| Vintage range | — | 2015–2024 |
| Fund statuses | Closed (4), Fundraising (2) | Closed (1), Investing (2), Harvesting (2), Liquidated (1), Fundraising (3) |
| Performance | ||
| Avg. net IRR | — | 53.0% |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 21 | 13 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.1 per $B | 0.8 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 48/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 19/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationships | 9 | 0 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | High |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 23% | |
| Strategy overlap | 5% | |
| Asset class overlap | 33% | |
| Geography overlap | 50% | |
HPS Investment Partners is a asset manager based in United States, while Pacific Equity Partners is a asset manager based in Australia. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, HPS Investment Partners is larger ($197B vs AUD 17B).