A side-by-side comparison of HPS Investment Partners and Oaktree Capital Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| HPS Investment Partners | Oaktree Capital Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 2007 | 1995 |
| Firm age | 19 yrs | 31 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $197B | $224B |
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Giant ($100–500B) |
| AUM ratio | 1.1× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | fixed income-focused | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Broad |
| Strategies | ||
HPS Investment Partners is a asset manager based in United States, while Oaktree Capital Management is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Oaktree Capital Management is larger ($197B vs $224B).
| 17 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Unitranche, Senior Secured |
| 18 — Distressed Debt, Opportunistic Credit, Direct Lending, Senior Secured Loans |
| Asset classes | fixed income, private credit | private credit, fixed income, private equity, real estate, other |
| Shared strategies | 5: Direct Lending, Asset-Backed Finance (ABF), Real Estate Debt |
| Shared asset classes | 2: fixed income, private credit |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | North America |
| Regions | North America, Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand | North America, Europe, Emerging Markets, Global |
| Shared geographies | North America | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 6 | 5 |
| Largest fund | HPS Strategic Investment Partners V | Oaktree Opportunities Fund XII |
| Fund statuses | Closed (4), Fundraising (2) | Closed (5) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 21 | 24 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.1 per $B | 0.1 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 32/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 7/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationships | 3 | 0 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 28% | |
| Strategy overlap | 13% | |
| Asset class overlap | 40% | |
| Geography overlap | 14% | |
